On 18/11/2007, at 1:01 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > We're still writing Ruby here, aren't we!!! > > Cheers, > David > >
Wanted to share my initial reaction to your Ruby statement. Are we writing Ruby here? Or are we writing specifications? Are we not using the power of the Ruby language to construct a DSL that allows us to construct specifications about the behaviour of our code? Wouldn't the ideal be that I could create Behaviour specifications using RSpec or JSpec or CSpec (or whatever) using language that is natural to writing specifications? So something like lambda ... which is a word I always have trouble typing ;-) ... would not seem natural to the domain of BDD? These were just my initial thoughts :-) On the actual implementation side ... if I really wanted doing in my specs I would add the one line and not really care too much that this is what I need to do. Cheers Shane _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users