On Nov 21, 2007 1:07 AM, Mark Van De Vyver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Googling 'RSpec describe scope' didn't yield much, so apologies if > this question has been dealt with. > > It seem well known that a ruby class is 'visible' between describes, > and if this is a problem then you should use some counter as prefix or > suffix: > 'class Item_001; ... end' > > Is there any work underway, or sheduled release where classes will > exist only in the scope they are defined?
This has never been brought up before. Feel free to submit a feature request at http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/. > Writing spec's for Og is where this becomes an issue because Og will > grab _all_ manageble objects it can 'see'... all sorts of PITA can > arise. I found this: http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/6924 So you could, in theory, monkey patch ExampleGroupMethods (in trunk 2937 - these names are changing a bit, so keep an eye out) to remove the defined constant > > Thanks for all the great work, T/BDD definitely is a brilliant way to > work, and RSpec makes it painless, esp for us amatuers :) That's what we want to hear! Thanks. Cheers, David > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
