On Sat Nov 24 21:54:58 EST 2007, Pat Maddox pergesu at gmail.com wrote: > Failed expectations are implemented using exceptions, so naturally > if you use --trace then rake will print a backtrace. If you don't > want it, don't use --trace.
I do not care about the presence or absence of a trace. What I want to know is why I get a rake failure if one of the specs fail. Surely a specification failure is an expected outcome for at last some of the trials. RSpec should just report that fact and let rake exit cleanly. I ran the previous trial with --trace just to avoid having someone write "please provide a trace". ---> C:\var\RSpec\depot>rake spec:models (in C:/var/RSpec/depot) NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence "products_id_seq" for serial column "products.id" NOTICE: CREATE TABLE / PRIMARY KEY will create implicit index "products_pkey" f or table "products" Product - should have a valid image url (FAILED - 1) - should have a description - should have a title 1) 'Product should have a valid image url' FAILED expected 1 error on :image_url, got 0 ./spec/models/product_spec.rb:40: Finished in 0.922 seconds 3 examples, 1 failure rake aborted! Command ruby -I"C:/var/RSpec/depot/vendor/plugins/rspec/lib" "C:/var/RSpec/depot/vendor/plugins/rspec/bin/spec" "spec/models/product_spec.rb" --options "C:/var/RSpec/depot/config/../spec/spec.opts" failed (See full trace by running task with --trace) <--- -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
