On 12/18/07, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's actually as it should be. The common use case for nested is
> that you create something in the outer group and expand its definition
> in the inner group.
>
> describe Thing do
> before(:each) { @thing = Thing.new }
>
> describe "with special magic powers" do
> before(:each) { @thing.grant_special_magic_powers }
> it "should be able to conjure up world peace" do
> @thing.should be_able_to_conjure_up_world_peace
> end
> end
> end
>
> This requires running the befores in the outer groups first, which is
> the opposite of what your example would require.
>
> Make sense?
Yes and it helps clarify my questions about how nested groups were
different, if at all, from shared groups.
--
Rick DeNatale
My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
