On 12/17/07 7:14 PM, "aslak hellesoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 5:58 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 17, 2007 10:55 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Dec 17, 2007 4:12 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 17, 2007 9:06 AM, Jeroen Houben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... Just received the message by David. This will be fixed in 1.1.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeroen - just for good measure, would you kindly update from trunk and
>>>>>> verify that it does in fact fix your issue?
>>>>>
>>>>> Finished in 3.42683 seconds
>>>>>
>>>>> 176 examples, 0 failures, 3 pending
>>>>
>>>> Thanks. I'll get the release out by tonight.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Awesome David.
>>>
>>> Do we have any specs that will catch this regression if it's reintroduced?
>>
>> I didn't look and don't have time right now. The fix was committed in
>> r3158. Can you check the diff?
>>
>
> I've added some more functional specs (r3172) that should prevent any
> transaction related bugs from coming back in.
>
> Jeroen - if you find more bugs, please report what Rails and Ruby
> versions you are using - it took me a while to realise that you were
> on Rails 1.2.3 (David told me)
Don't know if it makes a difference, but I was on 1.2.6
Cheers,
Jeroen
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
