Zach Dennis wrote: > On Jan 11, 2008 11:56 AM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Jan 11, 2008 9:54 AM, Ben Mabey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> David Chelimsky wrote: >>> >>>> In TDD there is a rule of thumb that says don't stub a method in the >>>> same class as the method you're testing. The risk is that as the real >>>> implementation of by_input_sets!() changes over time, it has access to >>>> internal state that could impact the behaviour of decompose!(). >>>> >>>> >>> So, stubbing a current_user method on a rails controller would be >>> considered bad practice? >>> I suppose stubbing the find on User would be just as easy but I have >>> always just stubbed controller.current_user. >>> >> Rails is tricky. These rules are stem from situations in which you are >> in complete control of the design. Clearly, Rails makes it easy to >> work with if you follow its conventions, but the resulting design is >> far from Object Oriented. This is not an inherently bad thing - don't >> get me wrong. I use Rails and it's a delight in terms of development. >> But it's a challenge in terms of this kind of testing. >> >> That said, the User class object is a different object than a user >> instance, so I have no issue w/ stubbing find on it. >> >> As for controller.current_user, a purist TDD view would have you move >> that behaviour elsewhere. I break the rule and just stub it directly. >> This general advice I learned from Uncle Bob Martin: sometimes you >> have to break the rules, but when you do you should do it consciously >> and feel dirty about it ;) >> > > On the current project we've quit moved all authentication into a > LoginManager. This has worked out so nicely as we have simple methods > for: login_from_cookie, login_from_session, > login_from_user_credentials, etc. > > This cleans up a lot of the hairy code sprinkled throughout > controllers and before filters which were trying to do some form of > authentication based on peeking at the sessions themselves or > validating users. > > Interesting, do you pass in the session in the constructor or how do you get access to the session data?
-Ben _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users