On Jan 31, 2008 10:48 PM, Nikolay Pavlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thursday 31 January 2008 14:42:55 David Chelimsky wrote: > > RSpec-1.1.3 has been released. > > > > If you're using RSpec and autotest, you'll have to upgrade to > > RSpec-1.1.3 and ZenTest-3.9.0 at the same time. > > > > == Version 1.1.3 > > > > Maintenance release. > > > > * Tightened up exceptions list in autotest/rails_spec. Closes #264. > > * Applied patch from Ryan Davis for ZenTest-3.9.0 compatibility > > * Applied patch from Kero to add step_upcoming to story listeners. > > Closes #253. * Fixed bug where the wrong named error was not always > > caught by "should raise_error" > > * Applied patch from Luis Lavena: No coloured output on Windows due > > missing RUBYOPT. Closes #244. > > * Applied patch from Craig Demyanovich to add support for "should_not > > render_template" to rspec_on_rails. Closes #241. > > * Added --pattern (-p for short) option to control what files get > > loaded. Defaults to '**/*_spec.rb' > > * Exit with non-0 exit code if examples *or tests* (in test/unit > > interop mode) fail. Closes #203. > > * Moved at_exit hook to a method in Spec::Runner which only runs if > > specs get loaded. Closes #242. > > * Applied patch from kakutani ensuring that base_view_path gets > > cleared after each view example. Closes #235. > > * More tweaks to regexp step names > > * Fixed focused specs in nested ExampleGroups. Closes #225. > > Hello all, hello David. > I am not sure were to go with this, but after upgrading to RSpec-1.1.3 and > ZenTest-3.9.0 i am observing memory leaks in autotest process:
http://blog.zenspider.com/archives/2008/01/zentest_version_391_has_been_released.html > 32001 quetzal 18 0 97472 93m 1464 S 25 9.2 1:43.28 autotest > After 5 minutes: > 32001 quetzal 18 0 102m 100m 1464 S 13 9.9 2:07.35 autotest > A few minutes later: > 32001 quetzal 18 0 112m 110m 1464 R 29 11.0 2:40.67 autotest > And so on... > > There are only two requirements in my .autotest file: > require 'autotest/redgreen' > require 'autotest/timestamp' > > Could some one confirm this behavior? > > -- > ====================================================================== > - Best regards, Nikolay Pavlov. <<<----------------------------------- > ====================================================================== > > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
