Not sure what you're talking about. 1) My blog is just standard typo, so the code I'm talking about isn't involved.
2) The feed on my blog, does indeed validate. Now if Safari has a problem formating it, it's not a validation problem. On 2/8/08, Giles Bowkett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hate to do this because it seems almost sadistic, but I encountered > some borkage in the feed in my Safari (3). > > http://s3.amazonaws.com/giles/rss_feed_bork.png > > On 2/8/08, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > As I posted to rails-talk yesterday, I whipped up an Rspec matcher > > using the feedvalidator gem, which lets you write > > > > response.should be_valid_feed > > > > in view specs or controller specs which integrate_views > > > > I wrote about it this AM. > > > > http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/articles/2008/02/08/validating-rss-feeds-with-rspec > > > > -- > > Rick DeNatale > > > > My blog on Ruby > > http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > > > > -- > Giles Bowkett > > Podcast: http://hollywoodgrit.blogspot.com > Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com > Portfolio: http://www.gilesgoatboy.org > Tumblelog: http://giles.tumblr.com > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- Rick DeNatale My blog on Ruby http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
