Op 16-feb-08, om 19:26 heeft Steve het volgende geschreven: > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:06:00 -0500, David Chelimsky wrote: >> >> The rspec/rails plugin works because there are generators which >> create >> the files for you, not because of any auto-loading facility. The >> generated files have require statements that get you the right stuff. >> >> We could conceivably add generators for other-than-rails apps. The >> reason we have them in rails apps is because there is already a >> generation facility that is easy to hook into. >> >> If we were to add generators, how do you think they should work? >> Where >> should they live? Part of the spec command? A new shell command? A >> separate plugin? >> > > I would think just have the spec_helper.rb file for the specs try to > load > config/rspec.rb or something along those lines. Similar to how rspec > for > rails just loads the rails env. It would then be up to the user to > do the > necessary loading in that file. There's really no way to know what > crazy > way someone might layout their projects. > > Steve
I second that. On the other side, autotest makes some assumptions about the layout of a project (that's how things got mixed up for me), why shouldn't rspec use the same conventions (and still keep the possibility to override conventions in config/rspec). Or it doesn't use conventions but it has a generator that makes a config/rspec file with some standard config in it. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
