>
> I have mixed feelings about this. If you do build up a library of step
> groups, having explicit scoping like this can be a great benefit.
> Agreed it makes things less convenient otherwise.
Hi David
Not sure I follow. Do you mean explicit scoping as having to type
"steps_for(:login)."? If so, I guess that would be handy to call methods
across step groups, but that would probably be bad style if they were in
different files. I see these helper methods as just a factoring out of
identical code.
I can see copying the helper methods to the scope in which the steps
> are executed. WDYT?
Do you mean copy and paste? Or have the code track down the methods you
created in the StepGroup scope and copy them into the runner scope? If so
that would be cool, it would be transparent then. Name clashes could be an
issue though.
Syntax day-dreaming led me to think of something like this:
Given "a signed-in support user called '$name'" do |name|
@support_user = SupportUser.new
# log in, etc
end
Given "something that needs a support user" do
give_me "a signed-in support user called 'Fred'"
@support_user.support_someone
end
or
When "user signs in with '$username' and '$password'" do |username,
password|
# type form, click submit etc
end
Given "a signed-in support user called '$name'" do |name|
perform_step "user signs in with 'support_user' and 'secret'"
end
or
Then "user should see text '$text'" do |text|
page.should =~ /text/
# type form, click submit etc
end
Then "user should see their details" do
include_requirement "user should see text 'Adam'"
include_requirement "user should see text 'Smith'"
include_requirement "user should see text '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
end
Is anything like this currently possible? If not, would it be (a) a Good
Thing and (b) straightforward to implement?
Ashley
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
