On 20 Mar 2008, at 14:31, Max Williams wrote: > Sorry to be pedantic, but shouldn't that be > "Your needs may differ from mine"? There's no party called 'mine', so > 'mine' has no needs :)
A quick google for "those of mine" brings back a google book hit for Shakespeare so maybe Edvard was being poetic :D > Anyway, does anyone have any idea why > -e "the name of a describe block" > > results in 0 tests being run for me? Are you sure you are running the outer-most group, and not an inner group or example? I just tried this file as test.spec.rb: describe "add_descendants_from_xml" do it "should add descendants" do true.should be_false end describe "with attributes" do it "should add attributes too" do false.should be_true end end end * the outer group name works ~/Desktop % spec -e "add_descendants_from_xml" test.spec.rb F 1) 'add_descendants_from_xml should add descendants' FAILED expected false, got true ./test.spec.rb:3: Finished in 0.007168 seconds * testing the name of the inner group fails ~/Desktop % spec -e "with attributes" test.spec.rb Finished in 0.001734 seconds 0 examples, 0 failures * but, as expected ~/Desktop % spec -e "add_descendants_from_xml with attributes" test.spec.rb F 1) 'add_descendants_from_xml with attributes should add attributes too' FAILED expected true, got false ./test.spec.rb:8: Finished in 0.007056 seconds Failing that, are you sure you haven't got a typo? I can't see a problem with the -e option. Ashley _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users