>> If you were to write an example that creates two models, and ensures >> that the duplicate errored appropriately, my "rule" is violated. >> Each >> of your examples is then specifying the behaviour of the >> validates_uniqueness_of method, which you didn't write. > > I don't really agree with this. The desired behavior is to disallow > two records with the same data. v_u_o is simply a quick and easy > means to that end.
Right. As I said (or intended to) that particular example was so simple that it was a grey area. But it did cause me to think about the problem, and I found it interesting. -Steven _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
