On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 01/04/2008, Martin Krauskopf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > yes, the .story extension is not supported out-of-the box. Unfortunately > > it is not possible to extend Ruby file-type now: > > > > http://www.netbeans.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=116563 > > > > But easy to fix inside of NetBeans. I've just fixed it on my local > > machine. I'll commit in few hours. > > > Hi Martin > > Sounds good. As it happens I will be working from home for a while so I get > to use my MacBook instead of Ubuntu, yay :D But I'm sure I will have to use > NetBeans again soon so I'll appreciate your patch. > > > > > BTW is the .story extension kind of "official" one? I saw in some > > tutorials using .rb extension. > > Actually I've never been clear on this. I'd love a page on rspec.info that > says This Is How You Should Name Your Files.
There's a reason such a page does not exist. We are letting convention emerge rather than dictating it. That said, the convention that I see emerging is .rb for stories expressed in ruby and either no extension or .story for those expressed in plain text. HTH, David > > Ashley > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
