On Apr 11, 2008, at 4:44 AM, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 11 Apr 2008, at 03:14, Rick DeNatale wrote: > >> I'm thinking that I might just write a whole new xxx_steps.rb file >> which would run the same story but at the real user interaction >> level, >> and keep the model level steps also. I still haven't convinced >> myself >> one way or the other. > > Wow, I had never thought of this. Could you really write a story that > could be executed in two different environments based on the steps > file that got loaded? Absolutely. That is, in fact, one benefit of plain text stories that we don't have with ruby stories ... Yet. > > > Ashley > > -- > http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ > http://aviewfromafar.net/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
