On 14 Apr 2008, at 14:36, Edvard Majakari wrote: > ..because you're likely smart enough to avoid using file as a > temporary variable whenever possible :)
Ha, I don't know... I haven't checked Daily WTF lately to see if any of my code has made it on there :) > First off, using the method similar to above would break bad if you > run tests in parallel inside the same process. But > that's easy enough to fix (eg. add some random stuff). No, I don't run > stuff in parallel yet because deep_test is not ready for RSpec yet, > but in the future, I hope I'll be able to. Well I'm already using something similar - the stories make a temporary directory with a random name to run the tool inside, so I guess a statically named stderr.out file would be ok in there. It's just that using a file to capture half the output of a command seems really ugly. I had checked out deeptest and it looks pretty cool. Fingers crossed it will support RSpec soon Ashley -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://aviewfromafar.net/ _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
