Hello, I have a suggestion on plain text stories and how unimplemented Scenarios are regarded.
When a Scenario has no Give/When/Body mark it as 'pending' rather than 'completed' as it does now. This would mean it would work like spec's 'it': Example: -------------------------------------------------- it "eat" it "sleep" it "be merry" -------------------------------------------------- 3 pending/ Yet to be implemented How I think Stories should work -------------------------------------------------- Story: monkeys Scenario: eat Scenario: sleep Scenario: be merry -------------------------------------------------- What I think it should output: >3 scenarios: 0 succeeded, 0 failed, 3 pending (Perhaps like specs a 'Yet to be implemented' is shown aswell) What is actually outputs: >3 scenarios: 3 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 pending When I write a new story I first create all the Scenarios names and then go through implementing the most important (as dictated by the client). Often I leave scenarios not deemed important by the client yet, but do provided potential further work. It would be very useful if those where marked as pending. I'm happy to put a patch together but wanted to check with the community that what I'm saying is sound. What do people think? Was there a particular reason why empty scenarios are marked as success? Thanks, Joseph Wilk http://www.joesniff.co.uk
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
