On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Jonathan Linowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2008, at 11:19 AM, aslak hellesoy wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Jonathan Linowes >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 24, 2008, at 12:31 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: >>>> >>>> In terms of the feature (which is the report), I see this as just >>>> another scenario. >>>> >>>> In terms of driving development and estimating effort, I see this as a >>>> new User Story. >>>> >>>> Does this clarify or further confuse? >>>>> >>> >>> >>> I see your scenario of 499 registrants as a new feature of the existing >>> story :) >>> >> >> In light of what David and I have said previously, I would express it >> exactly the other way around: >> >> "The scenarios in this user story describe an expansion of the >> existing feature." >> >> In other words, the story (and its scenarios) are inputs to the >> development. The output is a fatter feature. >> >> Aslak > > Aslak, so in terms of the cucumber runner and BDD development process, where > would you add the scenario? reopen an existing .story file? >
Yes, add it to an existing .feature file (or create a new one if the story's scenario don't fit in an existing feature). Aslak >> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> rspec-users mailing list >>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
