Hi, Here is the short version of my question: For stories, is webrat the way to go? How many of you use webrat? How many don't?
Here is the long version: I have been writing specs for some time now. I have noticed that once I learned how to write specs (both the syntax and the techniques) it made my development much faster and more reliable. However, while I was learning my development was painfully slow. So far it seems to be the same with stories. >From the recent posts I've seen on this mailing list, it looks like I should focus my efforts on learning cucumber instead of the built-in story runner. It is mostly compatible with what is already in RSpec, and it has some good extra features. Do you generally agree with that? What I am confused about, is whether or not I should learn webrat. It looks great in theory, and I've see it mentioned a few times. But I haven't seen a wide-spread move towards it. On top of that, the first time I looked at it I got rather confused. The reason I ask (instead of just trying it for myself) is that I'm the only developer on most of the projects I work on, so I can't afford a huge drop in productivity. And if my efforts learning to write specs are much of a guideline, it will probably take me 3-4 weeks to get comfortable with writing stories. I know I need to learn this, so I want to focus my efforts where I will get the most return on my time. Thanks PS. I am REALLY looking forward to the RSpec book! _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
