El 26/9/2008, a las 16:16, "David Chelimsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Wincent Colaiuta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
El 26/9/2008, a las 14:59, "David Chelimsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Wincent Colaiuta
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The following trick, calling "pending" from inside the before
block,
effectively does what I want. But I'm wondering if I can count on
this
behaviour going forward? What do you think?
Pending is not going anywhere.
I didn't think so... I was mostly concerned about the fact that I am
(ab)using it by calling it from inside the "before" block...
That doesn't strike me as abuse :)
Glad to hear you think so!
The truth is, sticking the check in the "before" block "feels" right,
at least to me, because asking "can I run this example?" is something
that I (obviously) want to do _before_ running each example. Bonus is
that the examples in question print out the pending message rather
than just disappearing into the nether.
In contrast, nesting all the affected examples inside a large "if"
feels much nastier.
Cheers,
Wincent
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
