On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> David, >>> >>> Can you tag this in git or push your git tags if you have done so >>> locally ? Thanks, >> >> The tags have already been pushed - I can see them on github, can you not? >> > > I was doing git tag -l from the rspec-dev repository, which shows > 1.1.4 and 1.1.5. From within the rspec and rspec-rails repositories I > am seeing 1.1.4, 1.1.5, 1.1.6, 1.1.7 and 1.1.8 tags. Does the > rspec-dev repository need to be tagged in general?
That's a good question. Right now some of the code examples for rspec-rails still live in the rspec-dev repo (in the example rails app). I'd like to change that anyhow. I'll it going forward, and if we find a need for it we can figure out dates and do a best guess retroactively. Cheers, David > > -- > Zach Dennis > http://www.continuousthinking.com > http://www.mutuallyhuman.com > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
