On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Luis Lavena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 4:41 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ... >> >> Also - the script files prepend vendor/plugins/rspec/lib to the path, >> but if they are not there, there shouldn't be a problem. That just >> ensures that if you DO have the plugin installed it takes precedence >> over the gem. >> > > But require 'rubygems' on top is missing, ending with LoadError due > missing 'spec' :-P
I've added that to script/spec: http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec-rails/commit/931f3700cf90f44f10ad599b360b20ebbbe95eab > Will get back to you with facts and all the details, 1.3.0 was > released with a bug on Windows so I need to cook a sandboxed ruby with > trunk version instead. Thanks for your help! Cheers, David > > -- > Luis Lavena > AREA 17 > - > Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from > the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent > disinclination to do so. > Douglas Adams > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
