Stephen Eley wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Rasmus Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> this feels like a duplication. If I write rspec-tests I should not do >> ordinary tests, because then I need to maintain two fixtures. Right? > > Correct. You don't need it. But the standard Rails generator doesn't > know that you're sneaking around on it with RSpec, so it keeps putting > boxes of chocolates in your /test directory hoping you'll pay more > attention to it and never knowing why you don't come home. It's quite > touching, really. Maybe even a little poignant. > > > -- > Have Fun, > Steve Eley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine > http://www.escapepod.org
That is a very nice way of putting it. Guess I still got some pending feelings for rails. Those scripts are evil! :-) Also, they are no good when practicing TDD IMO. Again, only rookie impressions... -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
