Cameron Booth wrote:
Hi all,

So my potentially crazy but I think good idea right now is to take the factory_girl gem and adapt it to generate stubbed models instead of actual ActiveRecord objects that get saved to the DB. My main reasoning there is that I like the syntax they've set up and some of the tools under the hood to deal with associations, etc, but I want to be disconnected from the database.

However, for mocking my ActiveRecord objects right now (in a rails project) I'm using mock_model from rspec-rails a lot, and I would love to use that in this code too. But I'm hitting a few walls including the methods into a separate class. So far I've got this:

class Factory

  include Spec::Mocks
  include Spec::Mocks::Methods
  include Spec::Rails::Mocks
def create_stubbed(attrs = {})
    model = mock_model(build_class)
  end
....

I'm getting a method missing on the method "stub" however, so I feel like somehow I'm not including the right stuff, or maybe I should be extending some things, not quite sure. (And yes, that's the method "stub", not "stub!")

Any advice would be awesome, thanks!

Cameron
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users


Cameron,
I would suggest looking into nulldb:
http://agilewebdevelopment.com/plugins/nulldb

With it I am able to maintain my same model factory interface without ever hitting the DB. Using the adapter is nice because you can turn it on or off when you please so you can really hit the DB in the cases that you need to.

HTH,
Ben
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to