very bizzare but whilst I needed to use this approach to fix one of my
tests, I realised the test before was working without having to make
it a big decimal - go figure :)
--------------------------------
it "should return last IR when date > last interest rate" do
@source_bank.ir(Time.now.to_date + 1.years).should == 8.5 # <== WORKED FINE
end
it "should return latest IR not greater than date specified when a
date is passed" do
@source_bank.ir(Time.now.to_date + 8.days).should ==
BigDecimal.new('6.5') # <== NEEDED TO USE BigDecimal here
end
--------------------------------
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Greg Hauptmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks Pat - yes I missed it when reading your email - I'd been using
> ".eql" for everything....thanks
>
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Greg Hauptmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> in fact I guess I was fishing for an easier way than this...if one
>>> exists? or is ruby & rspec "eql()" just strict here in terms of
>>> types?
>>>
>>> On 11/7/08, Mark Wilden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Greg Hauptmann <
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> expected 6.5, got #<BigDecimal:23d8284,'0.65E1',8(8)> (using .eql?)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How about just expecting BigDecimal('5.5')?
>>>>
>>>> ///ark
>>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure if you got my email before, but 6.5 ==
>> BigDecimal.new('6.5'). So use == instead and you should be good.
>>
>> Pat
>> _______________________________________________
>> rspec-users mailing list
>> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>>
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
