Since Cucumber is about BDD and defining the "acceptable and desired behavior" of the software through plain english (executable requirements if you will) it is not always clear what "level" the steps will implement.
In the case of Rails testing out of the box this maps roughly to: 1) unit tests - models 2) functional tests - controllers 3) integration tests - multiple controllers/models In Cucumber we're not really drawing those lines so clearly and tests will draw on some or more of each of these levels. Is this accurate? Thanks, Tim On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > James Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Ben Mabey wrote: >> >>> Right. Although, I'm unsure if rspec is even the default framework >>> outside of the rails generators. >>> -Ben >> >> Where can one get a handy quick reference of what syntax is acceptable >> to cucumber by default? > > <cheeky>Ruby syntax is acceptable</cheeky> > > Pat > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users