Thanks Ashley, you right. Atenciosamente, Daniel Lopes Area Criações Design, Websites e Sistemas Web
Visite: http://www.areacriacoes.com.br/projects http://blog.areacriacoes.com.br/ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 55 (31) 3077-4560 / 55 (31) 8808-8748 / 55 (31) 8737-7501 On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > On 5 Dec 2008, at 20:26, Daniel Area Criações wrote: > > This line is only saying that @properties (assigned[:properties]) have >> some value ... is that? >> assigns[:properties].should == :user_properties >> >> I can change above to assigns[:properties].should_not be_nill and the >> semantic value will be the same, right? >> > > > Ah no, the semantic value is different because this would also pass: > > def index > @properties = "vegetable soup" > end > > Yet that does not implement the same behaviour. > > When you write a behaviour example, always ask the question "What could I > realistically write that could pass this but not give the desired > behaviour?" That way you will avoid false confidence in specs where the > behaviour could be broken in the future (perhaps during refactoring), but > RSpec still reports success. > > > Ashley > > -- > http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ > http://aviewfromafar.net/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
