Matt Wynne wrote: > > I actually rather like the unambiguous, and jargon-free 'current > authenticated session' phraseology, but I'm not one of your users, so > that doesn't really matter!
I do too, but I am not the president either... > > I have one more suggestion. From all these different ways of saying > the same thing, pick a winner, then write a regexp step that catches > all the possible alternative ways of expressing it you can think of, > and raises an error saying "did you mean 'current authenticated > session'" (or whatever). > That is a very good idea. Yesterday, I caught myself about to write another multi-matching step definition regexp and I said, uuummm... better not. But catching those type of variants and failing the step with a meaningful warning message might just be the answer to this. Regards, -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
