David Chelimsky wrote: > > Seems like you've answered your own question. I'm not sure where it's > laid out in the docs, but I'm also unsure as to where you got the > impression you had :) >
Well, the impression came from my unconscious mental mapping of pass=true and fail=false. "should_be something" or "assert something_else" seem, on the surface, to be a simple true or false, yes or no, type conditionals. I mapped that impression, in the absence of any information to the contrary, to my personal expectations of my own tests. I have exerted myself to learn this stuff and even have taken the Pragmatic Programmers course on testing. Somehow I missed the distinction between fail and false. I am not likely to forget it however... Regards, -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
