On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Fernando Perez <li...@ruby-forum.com>wrote:
> Andrew Premdas wrote: > > I'd just like to point out that the Github wiki tool is somewhat > > challenged > Yeah I also think that the github wiki is showing its limits. It works > when the project only requires a few pages of documentation, but not for > Cucumber. > > Github should only be used for what Git is meant to be: a distributed > SCM and no more, i.e: cloning, pulling, pushing, forking. > > For documentation and other stuff a dedicated website is more > appropriate, like cukes.info, in fact I was surprised to see that the > documentation was still hosted at github, it adds more confusion to > newbies. One size doesn't always fits all. To paraphrase DrNic: http://drnicwilliams.com/2008/12/21/migrating-project-websites-to-github-pages-with-sake-tasks-new-websites-with-jekyll_generator/ The purpose of cukes.info is to *sell* Cucumber. The purpose of the GitHub wiki is to *educate* people who have decided to give it a spin. Why 2 sites? GitHub wikis have their own visual style - they are not suited to brand anything. On the other hand, I don't have time or even desire to create a wiki that is as good as the GitHub wiki and put it on cukes.info. Aslak > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- Aslak (::)
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
