2009-02-12 15:42, Pat Maddox: >> The fact that you are asking this shows that we're violating the >> principle of least surprise. > > Yes it's a surprise
How do you know #errors_on not implicitly validating wouldn't be bigger surprise? Say 30 (instead of three now surprised) people would be surprised. Would documenting implicit validation on code comments. Now it only says "Extension for should have on AR Model instances" on #errors_on. And imo it could very well say "Calls #valid? before returning list of errors." too, although seeing that yourself from source is only one click away if you you have dug yourself that deep in rspec-rails rdoc. -- Tero Tilus ## 050 3635 235 ## http://tero.tilus.net/ _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
