Hi Matt/Dan 2009/3/2 Matt Wynne <m...@mattwynne.net>:
> At the moment, IMO, the tools for feeding back the features to non-technical > people are pretty immature. My colleague Dan Lucraft wrote a tool which > produces a nicely-formatted PDF document from your features folder[1] which > is great, but won't work with the new version (0.2) of Cucumber when it's > released as the API against which such formatters are written has undergone > some significant changes for the new version. > > [1]http://www.daniellucraft.com/blog/2009/01/features_report/ To me the user\customer should be involved in the creation of the stories and the acceptance criteria and by producing a pdf later in the cycle for those stakeholders to read and understand may be argued as something that is not Story-Driven-Development and more like comprehendible automated tests. Aidy _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
