On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 2:48 PM, James Byrne <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote: > David Chelimsky wrote: >> >> No, no, no :) >> >> 5.should == 5 >> 6.should be > 5 >> >> Read them aloud and they.should make(:sense). >> >> Cheers, >> David > > Perhaps it is my dialect, but what is wrong with: > > "5 should be equal to 5" > > which generally is how I read "=="? Actually, I tend to read "==" (in > Ruby) as "is equal to".
Really? Are we still debating this? _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
