Pat Nakajima wrote:
Has anyone tried this? is it useful?
It looks interesting, though it could be confused for trying to exactly
mimic the actual markup, not just specify interesting parts.
It only specifies interesting parts. The gist writeup explained that, for
example, it skipped over intermediate <ol><li> tags. And it naturally skips
blanks in contents, and unlisted attributes.
It is exactly the same as the XPath version I posted before. That used explicit
XPath queries to skip over uninteresting parts.
David Chelimsky wrote:
> What is the method name was be_html_including instead of be_html_with???
('be_html_including'.length - 'be_html_with'.length) / 17 =~ 30%.
So 30% fewer people would bother to type it!
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
