Hi
Just noticed that the behaviour of
@cow.should_not be_hungry
is not the same as
@cow.hungry?.should == false # nil also passes
Don't know how this has escaped me for so long =)
What's the thinking behind this? You can already do
@cow.hungry?.should(_not) be_nil
so surely it makes more sense for be_true and be_false to check for
booleans?
Ashley
--
http://www.patchspace.co.uk/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran
http://aviewfromafar.net/
http://twitter.com/ashleymoran
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
