On 13 Mar 2009, at 21:47, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Tim Hart <th...@picagroup.com>
wrote:
List,
Quick question about Cucumber/Gherkin.
I'm considering adding 'With' as a step definition to support
scenarios like:
Given a policy
With a PCF practice state
And a secondary risk
...
I'm fairly new to ruby - but I can't quite get this one figured out.
I've tried adding
Cucumber.alias_steps (['With'])
To my features/support/env.rb file, but when I run cucumber, I still
get a Syntax error. It looks like my 'with' never gets added to the
original list.
Unfortunately, this only aliases the ruby methods (this will let you
call With /some step/ do..end in a step definition ruby file.
In order to make the plain text parser recognise other words, a
change is needed in languages.yml.
If you add a feature request in Lighthouse I'll see if I can add it.
I'm not sure if I like this - dependency between steps seems like a
dodgy road to go down.
When you're in a step definition, how would you know what object the
'With' was referring to?
Matt Wynne
http://blog.mattwynne.net
http://www.songkick.com
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
