Matt Wynne wrote:
On 14 Mar 2009, at 10:06, aslak hellesoy wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Luke Melia <l...@lukemelia.com> wrote:
Has anyone noticed a slowdown in performance of their cucumber suite
from 0.1 to 0.2alpha?
Ours is getting slower all the time (as we add more features) so it's
very hard to say. I've noticed it seems to take a little longer to
crank up because the features are all parsed first - I'm not sure that
happened before.
Cuke parsed all the features (well the ones you tell it to) in its
previous incarnations. The major difference is the new Abstract syntax
tree structure where we represent a more complex object structure than
before (but not massively I think). And hence we have more complex tree
traversal but again I don't see it being huge.
It would be interesting to see some performance comparisons.
--
Joseph Wilk
http://blog.josephwilk.net
Matt Wynne
http://blog.mattwynne.net
http://www.songkick.com
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users