Matt Wynne wrote:

On 14 Mar 2009, at 10:06, aslak hellesoy wrote:

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Luke Melia <l...@lukemelia.com> wrote:
Has anyone noticed a slowdown in performance of their cucumber suite from 0.1 to 0.2alpha?

Ours is getting slower all the time (as we add more features) so it's very hard to say. I've noticed it seems to take a little longer to crank up because the features are all parsed first - I'm not sure that happened before.
Cuke parsed all the features (well the ones you tell it to) in its previous incarnations. The major difference is the new Abstract syntax tree structure where we represent a more complex object structure than before (but not massively I think). And hence we have more complex tree traversal but again I don't see it being huge.

It would be interesting to see some performance comparisons.

--
Joseph Wilk
http://blog.josephwilk.net



Matt Wynne
http://blog.mattwynne.net
http://www.songkick.com

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users



_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to