On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Stephen Eley <sfe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/3/19 Rick DeNatale <rick.denat...@gmail.com>: > > Even 'should be' is a bit grating. I'm tempted to write a pair of > matchers > > like be_truthy and be_falsy, but I was wondering what other RSpec users > have > > to say. > > should be || should_not be: that is the expectation: > Whether 'tis nobler in the parser to interpret Alas, poor Eley! I knew him Chelmsky. -- Rick DeNatale Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/RickDeNatale WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
