Thanks David!

I will try the new matcher after I migrate to rspec 1.2.x :) But seems a lot easier to create . Really liking it!

Emmanuel

On Mar 25, 2009, at 6:00 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:

On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Zach Dennis <zach.den...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Emmanuel Pinault <seatm...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,


Is there way to generate a better error messages when I have a matcher in my
step like

1.should == 0  => would fail with expected 1, got 0

I would like to add more details to that error? Especially , in my case ,I
am using the include? matcher.

Check out rolling your own simple matcher:

http://apidock.com/rspec/Spec/Matchers/simple_matcher

It can be done in only a few lines!

Or the new Matcher DSL - simple matcher even simpler!

http://rspec.rubyforge.org/rspec/1.2.2/files/features/matchers/create_matcher_feature.html




Thanks

Emmanuel


_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users




--
Zach Dennis
http://www.continuousthinking.com
http://www.mutuallyhuman.com
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to