> -----Original Message----- > From: rspec-users-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:rspec-users- > boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Eley > Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:15 AM > To: rspec-users > Subject: Re: [rspec-users] Cucumber step definitions vs. RSpec examples > > Interesting. I don't think what you're saying is invalid, but I do > think it's an _unusual_ perspective to consider TDD and BDD as an > either/or. Depending on whom you ask, BDD is most often seen either > as an evolution/elaboration on TDD, or else the differences are viewed > as purely semantic. > > Either way, though, by practicing BDD you're generally doing > everything you'd do in TDD. You're still specifying > success-vs.-failure conditions before you write the code, and then > writing only the code necessary to achieve success. Whether you call > those conditions 'behaviors' or 'tests' doesn't change that > fundamental pattern. > >
Yeah I guess I didn't express that quite right, and I see what you mean. Either way, I mean I have to do some kind of test driven development, in whatever form it is. Brandon _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
