> > On 27 Apr 2009, at 19:08, Andrew Premdas wrote: > > Thankyou Aslak much appreciated >> > > Bear in mind that this trick will change the value of the constant FOR ALL > REMAINING SCENARIOS - not just the current one. >
I think you missed the After block. > > If that bothers you, have a read of this thread: > http://www.nabble.com/AfterCurrentScenario-block-td23100686.html > > > >> >> Andrew >> >> 2009/4/27 aslak hellesoy <aslak.helle...@gmail.com> >> >> Good question. One answer is that it can change, it just needs a code >> change and application restart. >> >> Basic business case is that someone will set the postage threshold before >> the application is deployed. However they could choose any value. So I want >> to test what happens when the application is setup with different values >> e.g. zero because all postage is free and £30 cos postage is free if you >> spend £50 or more. >> >> Currently we do not want to do form based admin for this setting (and >> similar ones) because such a change would be very infrequent, so we are >> currently happy to redeploy to make the change. >> >> I would do something like this: http://gist.github.com/102586 >> >> >> >> 2009/4/27 aslak hellesoy <aslak.helle...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Premdas <aprem...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Currently I have a very simple constants implementation being loaded as a >> Rails initialiser >> >> module MVOR >> module Postage >> THRESHOLD = BigDecimal.new('6.99') >> RATE = BigDecimal.new('30.00') >> end >> end >> >> >> My scenarios of my postage feature want to deal with two situations when >> the THRESHOLD has been set to zero and to '6.99'. The question is how can I >> set the threshold in my step_definition. So I want to implement >> >> Given the postage threshold is 0.00 >> Given the postage threshold is 6.99 >> >> >> Since it's a constant - how can it possibly change? And therefore - why >> are you testing it with different values? >> >> >> I've considered a number of ideas, but seem to keep on getting into >> complex solutions for what I assume is something very simple. >> >> TIA >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rspec-users mailing list >> rspec-users@rubyforge.org >> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >> > > Matt Wynne > http://blog.mattwynne.net > http://www.songkick.com > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users >
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
