Korny Sietsma wrote:
Celerity is very cool - when it works. It didn't work with out messy
combination of javascript libraries, alas. (Dojo 0.4-ish for legacy
bits, GWT for new bits) - apparently it will work with either of these
frameworks, but for us, with both, it died mysteriously (and we gave
up trying to fix it due to limited time)
- Korny
Yeah, I have had similar experiences with Celerity. To be fair, it is
not Celerity's shortcoming but rather it is HTMLUnit's and Rhino's for
not being able to support all the JS frameworks yet. If you don't have
a legacy system though I think Celerity is the way to go for JS testing.
-Ben
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Ben Lovell <benjamin.lov...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Matt Wynne <m...@mattwynne.net> wrote:
Have you looked at celerity? I'm not sure if webrat has an adapter for it
yet, but it's a 'headless' browser which drives a lot faster than selenium.
Some people on this list are getting a lot of joy out of it.
+1 to celerity. You need to jump through some hoops with JRuby/Java but it
cut the time it takes to run my features by 3-4 times almost.
Ben
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
