Okay, I fiddled around a little and made this solution:
module Spec
module Example
module Subject
module ExampleMethods
def should(matcher=nil)
if matcher
self == subject ?
Spec::Expectations::PositiveExpectationHandler.handle_matcher(self,
matcher) : subject.should(matcher)
else
self == subject ?
Spec::Expectations::PositiveExpectationHandler.handle_matcher(self) :
subject.should
end
end
def should_not(matcher=nil)
if matcher
self == subject ?
Spec::Expectations::NegativeExpectationHandler.handle_matcher(self,
matcher) : subject.should_not(matcher)
else
self == subject ?
Spec::Expectations::NegativeExpectationHandler.handle_matcher(self) :
subject.should_not
end
end
end
end
end
end
In short, if subject is set as self then I'm calling Kernel::should
method's body directly. I don't know if there's any side effects that
I'm omitting block parameter (although original should and should_not
also doesn't send any blocks).
Any problems that might arise with this patch?
Also, if my original example wasn't real life example enough, then I
will give another one:
require 'watir'
describe "Google" do
subject {self}
before :all do
@b = Watir::Browser.new
@b.goto "http://www.google.com";
end
it "has google written on page" do
should have_text("Google")
end
def has_text? text
@b.text.include?(text)
end
end
PS! I changed my poster nick, but I'm still the same "juuser" who made
original thread.
Regards,
Jarmo
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
