>
> On 8 May 2009, at 05:55, Mike Doel wrote:
>
>  Cucumber is awesome and destined to rule the world.  As that starts to
>> happen, has there been any thought of a mechanism for the community to build
>> a library of common, generally useful steps that can be used across
>> projects?  I've got stuff that I use for myself at:
>>
>> http://github.com/mdoel/cukesteps/tree/master
>>
>> This is stuff that I wish were in the default webrat_steps.rb file that
>> you get at the start.  Would it be better to fork Cucumber and add them
>> there and send a pull request to Aslak?
>>
>> It seems to me that there's an opportunity for packaging together and
>> sharing steps, but am curious of folks thoughts on the best way to go about
>> this.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>
> Great stuff, Mike.
>
> I had a similar thought a while back, but it never really took off:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rspec-users@rubyforge.org/msg07936.html
>
> I feel like this might be better suited to being a separate project, as
> you'll eventually have steps that are only relevant in certain contexts (we
> have quite a few that depend on factory_girl, for example), and it's likely
> to change at a different rate to the core cucumber code.
>
> It's almost like you want a kind of plug-in mechanism for sharing re-usable
> step libraries.
>

I agree with Matt - this sounds great. Could you add a link to the related
tools page in the wiki?

I think we already have a plugin mechanism for this. It's called RubyGems
;-)

Aslak


> Matt Wynne
> http://beta.songkick.com
> http://blog.mattwynne.net
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to