> Aslak Hellesøy wrote: > >> >> Which terms do you think we should adopt and where in the wiki should >> this be emphasized more clearly? >> >> Aslak > > The best suggestion that I can come up with is: Outline Tables for > Scenario Outlines and Inline Tables for regular scenarios. > > As far as the wiki goes then I suggest a general entry with the heading > "Tables". This page should contain a brief description of each type of > table explaining where each is encountered together with links to their > respective example. Nothing overly elaborate, just a single place to
Good idea > note that their is more than one type and that their employment and > syntax differs somewhat. > Their syntax is identical, but they have different semantics. > Cucumber is a marvellous tool, but the rate of enhancement ofttimes > leaves me behind for a bit. However, I far prefer having to sprint now > and then rather than dragging a moribund tool around behind me, wishing > that it had this or did that. Hehe. Thanks. Hopefully there won't be any major changes to the language from now on... Hopefully ;-) Aslak > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
