jruby-1.3.0
rspec/rspec-rails 1.2.6
I just ran into the 'Missing template' thing from the ticket below as
well. Is it really that uncommon for a controller action to redirect
or explicitly render a different template? Is it still considered
'invalid'? Seems silly to have to create a bunch of blank templates.
https://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645/tickets/765-controller-spec-with-xhr-gives-template-missing-error
I was also running into a conflict between the version of the rack gem
bundled with Rails 2.3.2 and the rack gem dependency from rspec-rails.
When running my app I was getting the error below from POST requests
that were expecting JSON back.
undefined method `split' for #<Mime::Type:0x7d429227>
/Users/Shared/eds_test/share/RubyGems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.2/
lib/action_controller/mime_type.rb:206:in `method_missing'
/Users/Shared/eds_test/share/RubyGems/1.8/gems/rack-1.0.0/lib/
rack/request.rb:51:in `media_type'
I'm not sure why it was picking up the rack-1.0.0 gem. I thought I
checked out all the upgrade notes and I did re-run the rspec generator.
My solution was to remove the rack-1.0.0 gem and comment out the
runtime dependency in the rspec-rails gemspec.
if Gem::Version.new(Gem::RubyGemsVersion) >= Gem::Version.new('1.2.0')
then
s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<rspec>, ["= 1.2.6"])
#s.add_runtime_dependency(%q<rack>, [">= 0.4.0"])
Anyone have any better suggestions? Maybe I have something peculiar
that others aren't hitting these issues?
Thanks,
-lenny
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
