David Chelimsky-2 wrote: > > That is by design. RSpec is about spec'ing things in isolation, > whereas cucumber is about spec'ing things end to end. RSpec controller > specs are about *controllers*, not views, so the presence and/or > validity of a view should not impact the controller spec. >
It was the 'no action responded to...' error, which I believe is to do with methods existing in the controller, not the 'template is missing' error regarding a missing view (I wasn't aware of the second one when I made the first post). I didn't realise that error would disappear when a view exists but no methods, so I see now that it is an integration issue, not a unit issue. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RSpec-not-failing-when-requesting-missing-method-view-tp24233965p24234411.html Sent from the rspec-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
