On 15 Jul 2009, at 23:03, Adam Anderson wrote:
Sometimes when features are asked to be removed it doesn't make sense to specify that they shouldn't be there. It seems to me that removing something from a tested app should not entail writing a failing spec for that change. I'm curious if people have different opinions or insights on this.
I think it depends on whether there's a chance the change you're making to remove the feature could regress somehow. If you feel the need to hem that potential regression in with a test then do it. If you're just chopping off loose code that nobody cares about anymore, chop if off and move on.
cheers, Matt +447974 430184 [email protected] http://mattwynne.net _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
