Fair point, thought you could also assume that the omissions are down to my
newness at RSpec and RoR :-)
The whole of the code is rather large, I am being asked to retrofit rspec
onto the code base as things are changed, so I am only showing what I think
are the relevent things..
Code Section
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
class Address < ActiveRecord::Base
#Status Codes as Constants
JUST_REGISTERED = 0
DELETED = 1
DECLINED = 2
APPROVED = 3
def status
DELETED
end
def reset
#We don't actually delete the record
#Instead a status field is set
#And all the data is blanked for data protection reasons
self.status = DELETED
self.business_name = ''
self.first_line = ''
self.second_line = ''
self.town = ''
self.county = ''
self.postcode = ''
#MR - added in the following fields
self.lat = 0.0
self.lng = 0.0
self.route_id = 0
self.save
end
#.. other code elided
end
------------------------------
RSpec
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
require 'spec_helper'
describe Address do
#Test Fixture - Before Each test Create a Standard Bread with the
following attributes and properties
before(:each) do
@address = {
:business_name => 'business', :first_line => '10, This Street',
:second_line=> 'erewhon', :town=> 'town', :county=>'county',
:postcode =>'AB12 3CD', :user_id => 1, :lat=>1.01, :lng=>2.02,
:status=>Address::JUST_REGISTERED, :route_id=>1
}
end
it "should have a status of deleted after reset" do
@address.reset
@address.status.should == :Address::DELETED
end
end
Thanks David as well, but Tom was right, it was my typing that caused that
issue.
Regards
Matt
2009/12/14 Tom Stuart <t...@experthuman.com>
> On 14 Dec 2009, at 20:36, Matt Riches wrote:
> > 1) Why are my methods undefined, when they are there (I can create the
> object via script/console and call the status and reset methods and see them
> work)
> > 2) What is the best way of resolving the issue
>
> You'd be much better off using pastie.org to show us the real code that's
> having the problem, because your example contains all sorts of omissions and
> typos (which is likely to be the sort of thing that causes your problem!)
> and it's impossible to tell how much of it is wrong in the original code
> versus how much was introduced by you rewriting it as an example.
>
> Cheers,
> -Tom
> _______________________________________________
> rspec-users mailing list
> rspec-users@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
