On 14 Jan 2010, at 17:02, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> -1
>
> You can already say
>
> a.should include("1:4")
>
> which is clearer IMHO.I assume Roger was referring to the general case though (which I still don't like) - and just happened to pick an example with an existing matcher. -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
