On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Phillip Koebbe <phillipkoe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Rick DeNatale wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Phillip Koebbe<phillipkoe...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> David Chelimsky wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Done: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/blob/master/features/command_line/example_name_option.feature >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Cool stuff! >>> >>> Does that match the describe groups as well? I would like to be able to >>> run >>> all of the examples in either "first group" or "second group". Will it >>> match? >>> >> >> Also, does anyone but me find the expectation in the case where >> there's no match surprising? >> >> > > I thought about that, as well. I would expect nothing to be done if no match > was found. Consider the case of misspelling the example or group and having > the whole shebang run instead of nothing.
Agreed: http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/blob/master/features/command_line/example_name_option.feature > > Peace, > Phillip _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
